Lore talk:Sigil Stone

Should we remove the technobabble?

The first sentence is copied pretty much word-for-word out of what is supposed to seem to the player as a technical text, full of jargon and the magickal equivalent of technobabble. It seems to me that it should be moved to somewhere else in the article, if not removed entirely. Xolroc (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2013 (GMT)

There are very rare explanations for magic in the ES universe, even if it's basically just fluff. Removing it altogether would be wrong. While I agree it needs to be rewritten, it shouldn't be removed entirely. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 23:54, 19 September 2013 (GMT)

Apart from "pre-Mythic quasi-crystalline morpholith", the rest seems pretty easy to understand in basic English. What should we call it, a black ball? —Legoless (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2013 (GMT)