Skyrim talk:Visage of Mzund

Armor rating?

Correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the game data say the base armor is 24, not 34? --Jimeee (talk) 10:14, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

Yeah its 24, I changed the page ^_^ — Kimi the Elf ^{(talk | contribs)} 11:12, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

It was 24 previously, until some IP changed that and it's gone unnoticed. --Roger (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

The note "This helmet affords by far the greatest amount of protection in the game, possessing over twice as much defense as a standard Dwarven Helmet." was just removed, whilst the note was incorrect, are there any helms that actually have an armour rating of 24 or more? — Kimi the Elf ^{(talk | contribs)} 11:55, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

From what I see, Konahrik has an equal armor rating of 24 and Miraak at the highest level provides a rating of 27. --Roger (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

Indeed, and the Masque of Clavicus Vile, even though you can't temper it, is way ahead with 31. I guess we could still stay that the Visage of Mzund provides more protection than a Dwarven helmet, but the difference isn't that big. Elakyn (talk) 12:22, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

Ok, scratch that; it seems that the Masque actually gives 23 armor rating, not 31. I'm surprised because the page has barely been changed since the game's release, so if someone else could please verify/test it, that's be kind. Elakyn (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2013 (GMT)

Thats also 23, and it seems it was me who put 31! >.< — Kimi the Elf ^{(talk | contribs)}