UESPWiki:Patrollers/Nominations/Completed/2020

This page is an archive of old nominations for patroller status and should not be edited. Please ask any questions on the main article's talk page

Dcsg

Dcsg (talk⁺ • contribs • edit count • logs • email)

Dcsg has done some amazing work in single-handedly setting up our Blades namespace the past couple of months by adding images, tables, templates, and a lot more. He is a quick learner, working accurate, open for suggestions to improve his edits, and overall just friendly and helpful. Besides working on Blades, he doesn't mind to get his hands dirty by editing Lore or Skyrim pages. As we are seriously lacking a patroller that is knowledgeable about Blades, I believe Dcsg will be a great addition to our team.

• Comment: I approve of this nomination. I got my start with the Dawnstar namespace and have since found a passion for editing here. I'm very documentation-minded and I find the most fun working on making structural/formatting changes (I used to do web design) and I love working on the obscure. Blades has many gaps just waiting to be filled, and it's that free reign that allowed me to get into it by making edits that I find fun. --Dcsg (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

• Support: As nominator. --Ilaro (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2020‎ (UTC)
• Support: Fully support this, he's really nice to talk to, and has been really good at doing Dawnstar and Blades. Active a lot on the Discord too. Imperialbattlespire (talk) 18:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: He contributes nicely towards the Blades space which is severely undocumented. Anyone that documents obscurer TES games and is active on editing has my support.Zebendal (talk) 18:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: Editing history is solid and having a patroller knowledgeable about Blades is helpful. —Dillonn241 (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: He does great work with Blades from what I've seen and he knows what he's doing. --Talyyn (talk) 04:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: Dcsg has been a big help with the Spin-off Series Completion Project and with templating, and his work in the Blades namespace is essential. I have every confidence in his patrolling ability. —⁠Legoless (talk) 22:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: Dcsg has done an incredible job with the Blades namespace and is probably the most knowledgable user of the game that the wiki has. The Rim of the Sky (talk) 22:07, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: He's been doing some great work in Template space, and what I've seen of his edits outside of that have been accurate and well-written. – Robin Hood  ^(talk) 06:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support: As above, but especially for the great work Dcsg has done in Bladespace. Echo (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Consensus: Support. Supported unanimously. Jeancey (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Imperialbattlespire

Imperialbattlespire (talk⁺ • contribs • edit count • logs • email) (AKA Proventus)

I would like to nominate myself as a potential patroller, I'm very active on the UESP, and constantly check recent changes anyways, often fixing grammar issues and spelling. I also feel like I am an active part of the UESP community, such as the Discord. I have a great interest in TES as seen by my contributions, especially those regarding lore and obscure games such as Shadowkey (Where I have recorded a lot of NPC dialogue), Battlespire, and Blades (NPC dialogue and screenshots). I have also constantly contributed to ESO, with screenshots and NPC dialogue. I also feel like there are not enough active patrollers, especially in regards to when TES6 will be released. Thanks for your time. Imperialbattlespire (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2020 (GMT)

• Support: I've always found ImpBat to be very reasonable and open to constructive criticism for his edits as well as willing to learn what he does not know. He's helped with many different areas of the site, including some of the lesser known games and lesser frequented namespaces. While I do believe that it is too early to be worried about the number of patrollers available for TES6, given that it is years away, I don't see any reason not to support this nomination. Jeancey (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2020 (GMT)
• Support: I had a feeling somebody would be making this nomination, based solely on the quality work Proventus has been doing across several namespaces. I have every confidence in this patrollership self-nom. —Legoless (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2020 (GMT)
• Support: Seeing how he wants to be a patroller and is an active editor, I don't see why not.Zebendal (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2020 (GMT)
• Support: Nearly a perfect candidate for patrollership. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 13:24, 20 February 2020 (GMT)

Consensus: Support. Supported unanimously. Ilaro (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2020 (GMT)